COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF PRETRANSPLANT NEPHRECTOMY METHODS IN CHILDREN WITH END-STAGE KIDNEY DISEASE

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

We analysed the results of pretransplant procedures in 29 children with end stage kidney disease. A detailed description of surgical technique was presented along with the evaluation of the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of surgery. Renewal interval of peritoneal dialysis using was also discussed. High performance of endoscopic methods in children with end stage kidney disease was confirmed. Retroperitoneoscopic procedures enable doctors to continue using of peritoneal dialysis in the first hours after the surgery.

About the authors

Yu. Yu. Sokolov

Russian Medical Academy of Postgraduate Medical Education

Author for correspondence.
Email: sokolov-surg@yandex.ru
Россия

D. V. Zverev

Russian Medical Academy of Postgraduate Medical Education; The St. Vladimir Children's Clinic hospital

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
Россия

V. I. Runenko

Russian Medical Academy of Postgraduate Medical Education; The St. Vladimir Children's Clinic hospital

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
Россия

A. P. Kiryukhin

Russian Medical Academy of Postgraduate Medical Education

Email: andresteam@mail.ru
Россия

T. E. Pankratenko

Russian Medical Academy of Postgraduate Medical Education; The St. Vladimir Children's Clinic hospital

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
Россия

G. A. Generalova

Russian Medical Academy of Postgraduate Medical Education; The St. Vladimir Children's Clinic hospital

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
Россия

References

  1. Нефрология детского возраста / Под ред. В.А. Таболина, С.В. Бельмера, И.М. Османова. - М.: ИД Медпрактик-М, 2005. - 712 с.
  2. Детская нефрология: Практическое руководство / Под ред. Э. Лоймана, А.Н. Цыгина, А.А. Саркисяна. - М.: Литтерра, 2010. - 400 с.
  3. Бикбов Б.Т., Томилина Н.А. Состояние заместительной почечной терапии больны с хронической почечной недостаточностью в Российской Федерации в 1998-2009 гг.: Отчет по данным Российского регистра заместительной почечной терапии) // Нефрология и диализ. 2011. Т. 13, № 3. С. 152-163.
  4. Hattori S., Yosioka K., Honda M. et al. The 1998 report of the Japanese National Registry data on peadiatric end - stage renal desease patiens // Peadiatr Nephrol. 2002. Vol. 17. P. 456-461.
  5. Lewis M.A., Shaw J., Sinha M.D. et al. UK Renal Registry 12th Annual Report (December 2009): chapter 14: demography of the UK peadiatric renal replacement therapy population in 2008 // Nephron. Clin. Pract. 2010. Vol. 115. P. 279-288.
  6. Pediatric Report. ANZDATA Registry Report 2009, Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry. Adelaide, South Australia; ESPN/ERA - EDTA Registry (2010) ESPN/ERA - EDTA registry annual report 2008; htpp: //www.espn-reg.org.
  7. Fraser N., Lyon P.C., Williams A.R. et al. Native nephrectomy in pediatric transplantation - Less is more! // J.Ped. Urology. 2013. Vol. 9. P. 84-89.
  8. Klaas N.M., Bax A., Georgeson K.E. et al. Endoscopic surgery in infants and children. - Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2008. - 491 р.
  9. Clayman R.V., Kavoussi L.R., Soper N.J. et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy: Initional case report // J. Urol. 1991. Vol. 146. P. 278-282.
  10. Figenshau R.S., Clayman R.V., Kerbl K. et al. Laparoscopic nephroereterectomy in the child: Initial case report // J. Urol. 1994. Vol. 151. P. 740-741.
  11. Поддубный И.В., Дедов К.А., Корзникова И.Н. и др. Лапароскопические операции при заболеваниях почек у детей // Детская хирургия. 1998. № 3. С. 11-15.
  12. Diamond D.A., McDougall E.M., Bloom D.A. et al. Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic nephrectomy in children // J. Urol. 1995. Vol. 153. P. 1966-1968.
  13. Borer J.G., Cisek L.J., Atala A. et al. Pediatric retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy using 2 mm. Intrumentation // J. Urol. 1999. Vol. 162. P. 1725-1730.
  14. Цырьяк А.Г., Сатаев В.У., Мамлеев И.А. и др. Особенности забрюшинного доступа при видеоретроперитонеоскопических операциях у детей // Детская хирургия. 2008. № 3. С. 21-24.
  15. Peters C.A. Complications in pediatric urological laparoscopy: results of a survey // J. Urol. 1996. Vol. 155. P. 1070-1073
  16. Berci G. Complications of laparoscopic surgery // Surg. Endosc. 1994. Vol. 8. P. 165-166.
  17. Capelouto C.C., Kavoussi L.R. Complications of laparoscopic surgery // Urology. 1993. Vol. 42. P. 2-12.
  18. Liapis D., de la Taille A., Ploussard G. et al. Analysis of complications from 600 retroperitoneoscopic procedures of the upper urinary tract during the last 10 years // World J. Urol. 2008. Vol. 26. P. 523-530.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2014 Sokolov Y.Y., Zverev D.V., Runenko V.I., Kiryukhin A.P., Pankratenko T.E., Generalova G.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: ПИ № ФС 77 - 81892 от 24.09.2021 г.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies