ESTIMATED EFFECTIVENESS OF USAGE OF MODERN SKIN EQUIVALENTS IN TREATMENT OF CHILDREN WITH DEEP BURNS

Cover Page


Cite item

Abstract

Biological and synthetic skin equivalents were developed to improve cosmetic and functional results of treatment of children with deep burns. They include both ReCell® technology and Suprathel® synthetic cover. The usage of these innovative technologies in pediatric combustiology is proven to be effective on the basis of remote therapy results considering the state of cicatricial tissue with the help of appliance of three-dimensional analysis.

About the authors

T. A. Korolyova

N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of health of the Russian Federation

Author for correspondence.
Email: mirbrat16@yandex.ru
Russian Federation

L. I. Budkevich

State Budgetary health Institution G.N. Speransky Municipal Children's Clinical hospital No 9 of Moscow health Department

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
Russian Federation

L. V. Shurova

N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of health of the Russian Federation

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
Russian Federation

D. D. Dolotova

N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of health of the Russian Federation

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
Russian Federation

References

  1. Алексеев А.А. и др. Комбинированная аутодермопластика с трансплантацией культивированных фибробластов при обширных глубоких ожогах: клинические результаты и перспективы // Материалы Международного симпозиума «Новые методы лечения ожогов с использованием культивированных клеток кожи». - Тула, 1996. С. 1-3.
  2. Будкевич Л.И. и др. Результаты применения культивированных аллофибробластов у детей с глубокими ожогами // Тезисы докладов сессии «Заместительная клеточная терапия» V Международного симпозиума по эстетической медицине. - 2006.
  3. Смирнов С.В. и др. Современные методы клеточной терапии при лечении ожогов // Хирургия. 2003. № 12. С. 58-62.
  4. Falanga V. et al. Wounding of bioengineered skin: cellular and molecular aspects after injury// J. Invest. Dermatol. 2002. Vol. 119, № 3. P. 653-660.
  5. Billingham R.E., Reynolds J. Transplantation studies on sheets of pure epidermal epithelium and on epidermal cell suspensions // Br.J. Plastic Surgery. 1952. Vol. 5, Iss. 1. P. 25-36.
  6. Khodadadi L. et al. Cell therapy in Burn Repair // Yakhteh Med. J. 2008. Vol. 10, N 3. P. 167-178.
  7. Wood F.M. et al. The use of a non-cultured autologous cell suspension and Integra dermal regeneration template to repair full-thickness skin wounds in a porcine model: a one-step process // Burns. 2007. Vol. 33, N 6. P. 693-700.
  8. Goodman G. An automated autologous cell transplantation method for treatment of hypopigmented scarring // Dermat. Surgery. 2008. Vol. 34. P. 579-581.
  9. Back C. et al. Noncultured keratinocyte/melanocyte cosuspension: effect on reepithelialisation and repigmentation a randomized, placebo-controlled study // J. Burn Care & Research. 2009. Vol. 30, N 3. P. 408-416.
  10. Navarro F.A. et al. Sprayed keratinocyte suspensions accelerate epidermal coverage in a porcine microwound model // J. Burn Care & Rehabilitation. 2000. Vol. 21, N 6. P. 513-518.
  11. Conti E., Wood F., Leclerc-Chalvet M. ReCell®: Indications, Clinical Practice and Expected Outcomes // J. Wound Tech. 2009. Vol. 4. P. 59-62.
  12. Gravante G. et al. A randomized trial comparing ReCell system of epidermal cells delivery versus classic skin grafts for the treatment of deep partial thickness burns // Burns. 2007. Vol. 33, N 8. P. 966-972.
  13. Юдинцева Н.М. и др. Восстановление соединительной ткани в результате трансплантации на раны экспериментальных животных дермального эквивалента на основе фибрина // Цитология. 2010. Т. 52, № 9. С. 724-728.
  14. Peck M.D. et al. A trial of the effectiveness of artificial dermis in the treatment of patients with burns greater than 45% total body surface area // J. Trauma. 2002. Vol. 52. P. 971-978.
  15. Pham C. et al. Bioengineered skin substitutes for the management of burns: a systematic review // Burns. 2007. Vol. 33. P. 946-957.
  16. van der Veen V.C. et al. Biological background of dermal substitutes // Burns. 2010. Vol. 36. P. 305-321.
  17. Highton L., Wallace C., Shah M. Use of Suprathel® for partial thickness burns in children // Burns. 2013. Vol. 39, N 1. Р. 136-141.
  18. Schwarze H. et al. Suprathel, a new skin substitute, in the management of partial-thickness burn wounds: results of a clinical study // Ann. Plast. Surg. 2008. Vol. 60, N 2. P. 181-185.
  19. Braye F. Skin substitutes reconstructed in the laboratory: application in burn treatment // Pathol. Biol. 2005. Vol. 53, N 10. P. 613-617.

Copyright (c) 2014 Korolyova T.A., Budkevich L.I., Shurova L.V., Dolotova D.D.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: ПИ № ФС 77 - 81892 от 24.09.2021 г.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies