Biomarkers of neonatal sepsis in children with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome: review

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Neonatal sepsis is a life-threatening condition with a high mortality rate, despite significant advances in perinatology and neonatology. The clinical signs of sepsis in newborns are nonspecific and can mimic a wide range of non-infectious pathologies, making early diagnosis challenging. The aim of this review was to analyze current data on laboratory markers of neonatal sepsis. A search was conducted in the PubMed database using the keywords neonatal sepsis, biomarker, prognosis. The search yielded 66 publications, an additional 9 publications were retrieved from the eLibrary database using the keywords биомаркеры (biomarkers), сепсис (sepsis), прогноз (prognosis). The search period was 5 years (2020–2025), in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. A review of the current literature confirms that no single laboratory marker, whether classical (C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, interleukin-6) or novel (presepsin, CD64, serum amyloid A, sTREM-1), is ideal due to limited specificity, the influence of non-infectious factors, and variability with gestational age. The most promising approach to diagnosing neonatal sepsis is a combined approach that includes simultaneous measurement of several biomarkers alongside clinical data. Artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies, which can analyze multidimensional data, predict sepsis at a preclinical stage, and create personalized diagnostic algorithms, show particular promise. Further research should therefore focus on developing integrated diagnostic systems to improve the accuracy, speed, and efficacy of sepsis detection in newborns.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Alexandr V. Golomidov

S.V. Belyaev Kuzbass Regional Clinical Hospital

Author for correspondence.
Email: golomidov.oritn@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7522-9094
SPIN-code: 4406-2065

MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Kemerovo

Evgeny V. Grigoriev

Research Institute for Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases

Email: grigorievev@hotmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8370-3083
SPIN-code: 2316-2287

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Russian Federation, Kemerovo

Vadim G. Mozes

Kemerovo State University

Email: vadimmoses@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3269-9018
SPIN-code: 5854-6890

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor

Russian Federation, Kemerovo

References

  1. Strunk T, Molloy EJ, Mishra A, Bhutta ZA. Neonatal bacterial sepsis. Lancet. 2024;20:404(10449):277–293. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00495-1
  2. Smolkina EO, Lekmanov AU. Neonatal sepsis and septic shock: Towards the implementation of phenotyping into clinical practice. Russian Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Anesthesia and Intensive Care. 2025;15(1):51–70. doi: 10.17816/psaic1873 EDN: UHHLQI
  3. Lekmanov AU, Mironov PI, Aleksandrovich YuS, et al. Sepsis in children: federal clinical guideline (draft). Russian Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Anesthesia and Intensive Care. 2021;11(2):241–292. doi: 10.17816/psaic969 EDN: UDVCKO
  4. Lekmanov AU, Mironov PI, Aleksandrovich YuS, et al. 2025 National clinical huideline for sepsis in children. Russian Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Anesthesia and Intensive Care. 2025;15(4):583–619. doi: 10.17816/psaic1977 EDN: PYYQES
  5. Glaser MA, Hughes LM, Jnah A, Newberry D. Neonatal sepsis: A review of pathophysiology and current management strategies. Adv Neonatal Care. 2021;21(1):49–60. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000769
  6. Peng Z-J, Bao L. Effect of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis of group B Streptococcus infection on the incidence and bacteriological profile of early-onset neonatal sepsis. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke ZaZhi. 2022;24(1):49–53. doi: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2109031
  7. Mironov PI, Lekmanov AU, Bogdanov RN, Ochilova RA. Risk factors for chronic critical illness in children with sepsis. Messenger of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation. 2026;23(1):50–56. doi: 10.24884/2078-5658-2026-23-1-50-56 EDN: GHGGJA
  8. Kariniotaki C, Thomou C, Gkentzi D, et al. Neonatal sepsis: A comprehensive review. Antibiotics (Basel). 2024;14(1):6. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14010006
  9. Stocker M, Rosa-Mangeret F, Agyeman PKA, et al. Management of neonates at risk of early onset sepsis: a probability-based approach and recent literature appraisal: Update of the Swiss national guideline of the Swiss Society of Neonatology and the Pediatric Infectious Disease Group Switzerland. Eur J Pediatr. 2024;183(12):5517–5529. doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05811-0
  10. Mironov PI, Alexandrovich YuS, Trembach AV, Lekmanov AU. Assessment of the information value of the Phoenix Sepsis Score scale after the first day of sepsis treatment in children. Messenger of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation. 2024;21(6):57–62. doi: 10.24884/2078-5658-2024-21-6-57-62 EDN: MEWBUR
  11. Celik IH, Hanna M, Canpolat FE, Pammi M. Diagnosis of neonatal sepsis: the past, present and future. Pediatr Res. 2022;91(2):337–350. doi: 10.1038/s41390-021-01696-z
  12. Popescu CR, Cavanagh MM, Tembo B, et al. Neonatal sepsis in low-income countries: epidemiology, diagnosis and prevention. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2020;18(5):443–452. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2020.1732818
  13. Huggard D, Powell J, Kirkham C, et al. Time to positivity (TTP) of neonatal blood cultures: a trend analysis over a decade from Ireland. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021;34(5):780–786. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1617687
  14. Bethou A, Bhat BV. Neonatal sepsis-newer insights. Indian J Pediatr. 2022;89(3):267–273. doi: 10.1007/s12098-021-03852-z
  15. Elnoby AS, Nahla R. The Clinical utility and stewardship challenges of time to blood culture positivity. Hosp Pharm. 2025;27:00185787251364488. doi: 10.1177/00185787251364488
  16. De Rose DU, Perri A, Auriti C, et al. Time to positivity of blood cultures could inform decisions on antibiotics administration in neonatal early-onset sepsis. Antibiotics (Basel). 2021;10(2):123. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10020123
  17. Dierikx TH, Visser DH, de Meij T, et al. Molecular assays for the diagnosis of sepsis in neonates: a diagnostic test accuracy review. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025;3(3):CD011926. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011926.pub3
  18. Attia Hussein Mahmoud H, Parekh R, Dhandibhotla S, et al. Insight into neonatal sepsis: an overview. Cureus. 2023;15(9):e45530. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45530
  19. Wang J, Wang Z, Zhang M, et al. Diagnostic value of mean platelet volume for neonatal sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020;99(32):e21649. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021649
  20. De Rose DU, Ronchetti MP, Martini L, et al. Diagnosis and management of neonatal bacterial sepsis: current challenges and future perspectives. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2024;9(9):199. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed9090199
  21. Šundalić S, Košuta I, Baršić Lapić I, et al. Interleukin-6 and leukocyte cell population data in newly diagnosed sepsis — a prospective study. Medicina (Kaunas). 2025;61(3):468. doi: 10.3390/medicina61030468
  22. Sun T, Luo Z, Luo J, Deng S. Leukocyte cell population data (CPD) as a discriminating tool between active tuberculosis and lung cancer. Clin Lab. 2023;69(11). doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2023.230511
  23. Roccaforte V, Sabbatini G, Panella R, et al. The potential role of leukocytes cell population data (CPD) for diagnosing sepsis in adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2025;63(5):1031–1042. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2024-1202
  24. Ferraro F, Fillistorf L, Dimopoulou V, et al. Neonatal leucocyte cell population data: reference intervals and relevance for detecting sepsis and necrotizing enterocolitis. Pediatr Res. 2026;99:612–622. doi: 10.1038/s41390-025-04159-x
  25. El-Masry HMA, Hassan A-EA, Amin HH, et al. Evaluation of serum presepsin concentrations as a biomarker of sepsis in high-risk neonates. Al-Azhar Assiut Med J. 2021;19(1):160–167. doi: 10.4103/AZMJ.AZMJ_122_19
  26. Herzlich J, Waksman Y, Marom R, et al. Determinants of CRP measurements and CRP dynamics during early neonatal sepsis work up. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):18031. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-02337-9
  27. Neha G, Nidhi Ch, Utkarsh J, et al. Advancement in biomarker based effective diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2023;51(1):476–490. doi: 10.1080/21691401.2023.2252016
  28. Rashwan NI, Hassan MH, Mohey El-Deen ZM, El-Abd Ahmed A. Validity of biomarkers in screening for neonatal sepsis — A single center-hospital based study. Pediatr Neonatol. 201;60(2):149–155. doi: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2018.05.001
  29. Li Y, Zhao J, Yu X. Feasibility analysis of TCB, hs-CRP, and UCB/ALB as outcome measures for dynamic assessment during phototherapy of neonates with hyperbilirubinemia. Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev. 2024;40(3):2332–2345. doi: 10.1080/02648725.2023.2199245
  30. Rudnov VA, Moldovanov AV, Astafieva MN, Perevalova EYu. Clinical significance of pro-adrenomedullin content in blood in patients with sepsis. Bulletin of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine. 2019;16(5):36–42. doi: 1021292/2078-5658-2019-16-5-36-42 EDN: SEFWLK
  31. Milas GP, Issaris V. Proadrenomedullin and neonatal sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy. Eur J Pediatr. 2022;181(1):59–71. doi: 10.1007/s00431-021-04214-9
  32. Antari V, Skoura L, Hatzipantelis E, et al. Kinetics and role of pancreatic stone protein and midregional proadrenomedullin as predictors of sepsis and bacteremia in children with hematological malignancies. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2023;15(1):e2023065. doi: 10.4084/MJHID.2023.065
  33. Guo Z, Yan H, Xu R, et al. An ultra-sensitive electrochemical biosensor for the detection of procalcitonin in sepsis patients’ serum, using a Cu-BHT-based thin film. Talanta. 2024;268-1:125325. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2023.125325
  34. Sundara SV, Lu X, Busmail H, et al. C-reactive protein versus procalcitonin in the early diagnosis of neonatal sepsis: A systematic review. Cureus. 2025;17(8):e90353. doi: 10.7759/cureus.90353
  35. Chen Q, Chen J, Zhong R. Diagnostic utility of combined serum procalcitonin and C-reactive proteins in neonatal sepsis. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2025;86(12):1–18. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2025.0745
  36. Sakharova KV, Cherkasova MV, Erdes SF. Serum amyloid A as a marker of ankylosing spondylitis activity. Modern Rheumatology Journal. 2021;15(6):72–75. doi: 10.14412/1996-7012-2021-6-72-75 EDN:EJAMKI
  37. Van Leeuwen LM, Fourie E, van den Brink G, et al. Diagnostic value of maternal, cord blood and neonatal biomarkers for early-onset sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2024;30(7):850–857. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2024.03.005
  38. Wang H, Yao J, Huang B, et al. Meta-analysis of serum amyloid A for the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis: A comprehensive evaluation of diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility. Medicine (Baltimore). 2025;104(35):e44197. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000044197
  39. Mwesigye P, Rizwan F, Alassaf N, Khan R. The role and validity of diagnostic biomarkers in late-onset neonatal sepsis. Cureus. 2021;13(8):e17065. doi: 10.7759/cureus.17065
  40. Zuin M, Trentini A, Marsillach J, et al. Paraoxonase-1 (PON-1) arylesterase activity levels in patients with coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis. Dis Markers. 2022:4264314. doi: 10.1155/2022/4264314
  41. Annagür A, Örs R, Altunhan H, et al. Total antioxidant and total oxidant states, and serum paraoxonase-1 in neonatal sepsis. Pediatr Int. 2015;57(4):608–613. doi: 10.1111/ped.12557
  42. Bourika V, Bartzeliotou A, Spiliopoulou C, et al. Paraoxonase (PON)-1 activity in septic neonates: One more arrow in the quiver of biomarkers of neonatal sepsis? Clin Biochem. 2021;93:119–121. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2021.03.019
  43. Yurttutan UN, Sayar AK, Kocagöz AS, et al. Sepsis biomarkers for early diagnosis of bacteremia in emergency department. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2023;17(6):832–839. doi: 10.3855/jidc.17221
  44. Mithal LB, Becker ME, Ling-Hu T, et al. Cord blood proteomics identifies biomarkers of early-onset neonatal sepsis. JCI Insight. 2025;10(13):e193826. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.193826
  45. Lan H-M, Wu C-C, Liu S-H, et al. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracies of various biomarkers and scoring systems for sepsis: A systematic review and Bayesian diagnostic test accuracy network meta-analysis. J Crit Care. 2025;88:155087. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2025.155087
  46. Eguchi T, Niiyama S, Kamikokuryo C, et al. Comparative study of blood neopterin and biopterins in patients with COVID-19 and secondary bacterial infection. J Clin Med. 2024;13(15):4365. doi: 10.3390/jcm13154365
  47. Awad HM, Hawary MA, Kholef EFM, et al. Serum neopterin level in early onset neonatal sepsis. Egypt J Hosp Med. 2020;81(1):1193–1203.
  48. Boseila S, Seoud I, El-Gamal H, Ibrahim TS. Serum neopterin level in early onset neonatal sepsis. J Am Sci. 2011;7(7):1545.
  49. Karakulova YuV, Sexyaev NE, Sosnin DY. Neopterin concentration in cerebrospinal fluid in HIV-positive patients with central nervous system complications. Laboratory service. 2021;10(3):21-27. doi: 10.17116/labs20211003121 EDN:VNNAIU
  50. Priolo F, Maggio L, Fattore S, et al. Cord blood presepsin as a predictor of early-onset neonatal sepsis in term and preterm newborns. Ital J Pediatr. 2023;49(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s13052-023-01420-z
  51. Pospisilova I, Brodska HL, Bloomfield M, et al. Evaluation of presepsin as a diagnostic tool in newborns with risk of early-onset neonatal sepsis. Front Pediatr. 2023;10:1019825. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.1019825
  52. Poggi C, Lucenteforte E, Petri D, et al. Presepsin for the diagnosis of neonatal early-onset sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2022;176(8):750–758. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.1647
  53. Peng K, Zhang X, Li Q, Luo Z. Presepsin as a diagnostic biomarker for sepsis across neonates, children, and adults: A meta-analysis. Biomol Biomed. 2025;26(2):307–319. doi: 10.17305/bb.2025.12909
  54. Özgeriş FB, Koçak ÖF, KurtN, et al. Increased serum progranulin levels in patients with coronavirus infection (COVID-19): a pilot study. Biochemistry. 2022;87(3):376–386. doi: 10.31857/S0320972522030058
  55. Bei D, Cheng Y, Jiang R, et al. Serum progranulin as a potential diagnostic predictor in neonatal sepsis. Cureus. 2025;17(7):e88360. doi: 10.7759/cureus.88360
  56. Rao L, Song Z, Yu X, et al. Progranulin as a novel biomarker in diagnosis of early-onset neonatal sepsis. Cytokine. 2020;128:155000. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2020.155000
  57. Khutornaya MV, Sinitskaya AV, Sinitsky MYu, et al. Soluble triggering receptor (sTREM-1) in pathogenesis of multiple organ failure after cardiac surgery. Russian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology. 2023;(1):26–32. doi: 10.17116/anaesthesiology20230112 EDN: GSARKQ
  58. Duan Y, Li P, Liang Y, Chen Y. Diagnostic value of sTREM-1, sCD25, sCD40L and sCD130 in late-onset neonatal sepsis. J Infect Chemother. 2025;31(4):102684. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2025.102684
  59. Chang C, Gao Q, Deng G, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic predictive values of triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cell-1 expression in neonatal sepsis: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Front Pediatr. 2022;10:929665. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.929665
  60. Jiang F, Sun L. Elevated KLF2 and YKL-40 with reduced vitamin A as predictive biomarkers for severity and prognosis in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Transl Res. 2025;17(5):3424–3434. doi: 10.62347/ZNNV1969
  61. Steletou E, Metallinou D, Margeli A, et al. Serum YKL-40 as a potential biomarker for sepsis in term neonates-a pilot study. Children (Basel). 2023;10(5):772. doi: 10.3390/children10050772
  62. Ramírez-Ramírez A, Mancilla-Herrera I, Figueroa-Damián R, et al. Expression of CD64 and CD69 as biomarkers for late-onset sepsis diagnosis in infants born prematurely. Braz J Infect Dis. 2025;29(2):104511. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2025.104511
  63. Hashem HE, Ahmed WO, Hassan SH. The role of neutrophil CD11b compared to neutrophil CD64 as an early diagnostic, monitoring, and prognostic sepsis marker in neonatal ICUs: Case-control-methodological study. Biomed Res Int. 2025;2025:7206112. doi: 10.1155/bmri/7206112
  64. Morya B, Kumar V, Maria A, et al. Role of neutrophil CD64 in early detection of neonatal sepsis and its correlation with other sepsis biomarkers. Fetal Pediatr Pathol. 2025;44(6):521–529. doi: 10.1080/15513815.2025.2558622
  65. Huang R, Lu T-L, Liu R-H. Comparison of the accuracy of hematological parameters in the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis: a network meta-analysis. Infection. 2025;53(1):231–239. doi: 10.1007/s15010-024-02354-2
  66. Aleksandrovich YuS, Balashova EN, Boronina IV, et al. Sepsis in newborns (Draft federal guidelines). Pediatrician (St. Petersburg). 2024;15(4):5–53. doi: 10.17816/PED1545-53 EDN: WZPBAT
  67. Tessema B, Lippmann N, Willenberg A, et al. The diagnostic performance of interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein for early identification of neonatal sepsis. Diagnostics. 2020;10(11):978. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10110978
  68. Henry KE, Adams R, Parent C, et al. Factors driving provider adoption of the TREWS machine learning-based early warning system and its effects on sepsis treatment timing. Nat Med. 2022;28:1447–1454. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01895-z
  69. Duci M, Verlato G, Moschino L, et al. Advances in artificial intelligence and machine learning for precision medicine in necrotizing enterocolitis and neonatal sepsis: A state-of-the-art review. Children (Basel). 2025;12(4):498. doi: 10.3390/children12040498
  70. Huang Q, Mai Q, Wei Q, et al. Shared immune biomarkers in necrotizing enterocolitis and neonatal sepsis identified via bioinformatics and machine learning. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):33142. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-18435-7
  71. Meeus M, Beirnaert C, Mahieu L, et al. Clinical decision support for improved neonatal care: the development of a machine learning model for the prediction of late-onset sepsis and necrotizing enterocolitis. J Pediatr. 2024;266:113869. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2023.113869
  72. Shu C-H, Zebda R, Espinosa C, et al. Early prediction of mortality and morbidities in VLBW preterm neonates using machine learning. Pediatr Res. 2025;97(6):2056–2064. doi: 10.1038/s41390-024-03604-7
  73. Holmes E, Kauffman J, Juliano C, et al. Distinguishing neonatal culture-negative sepsis from rule-out sepsis with artificial intelligence-derived graphs. Pediatr Res. 2025;97(3):868–870. doi: 10.1038/s41390-024-03458-z
  74. Kim J-H, Lee K, Kim KJ, et al. Validation of an artificial intelligence-based algorithm for predictive performance and risk stratification of sepsis using real-world data from hospitalised patients: a prospective observational study. BMJ Health Care Inform. 2025;32(1):e101353. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101353
  75. Sullivan BA, Kausch SL, Fairchild KD. Artificial and human intelligence for early identification of neonatal sepsis. Pediatr Res. 2023;93(2):350–356. doi: 10.1038/s41390-022-02274-7
  76. Sullivan BA, Keim-Malpass J. BARRIERS to early detection of deterioration in hospitalized infants using predictive analytics. Hosp Pediatr. 2021;11(9):e195–e198. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2020-004382

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. PRISMA flowchart.

Download (248KB)

Copyright (c) 2026 Eco-Vector

License URL: https://eco-vector.com/for_authors.php#07

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: ПИ № ФС 77 - 81892 от 24.09.2021 г.