History of robotics in surgery

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The pioneering projects aimed at integrating automated devices into surgical practice date back to the late 1960s. However, the transition from concept to a mass-produced product took nearly three decades. Today, the da Vinci platform (Intuitive Surgical Inc., USA) dominates the global medical community as a system for performing minimally invasive procedures. Importantly, its success was preceded by the development of earlier prototypes, including ZEUS, AESOP, ROBODOC, and the Green Telepresence System. Notably, the original purpose of these technological innovations was not commercial medicine but rather the provision of surgical care under field conditions, including battlefield settings. The research groundwork established with the participation of SRI International and the Advanced Research Projects Agency was later transferred to the private sector. The subsequent consolidation of multiple market players ultimately led to the formation of Intuitive Surgical Inc. This article reconstructs the complete chronology of the development of surgical robots. The methodology includes a meticulous analysis of archival data and scientific publications, as well as direct interviews with leading experts in the field of minimally invasive techniques. Such work is essential, as robotic interventions are currently evolving from an experimental approach into a widely accepted clinical standard, which necessitates a comprehensive understanding of the path already taken.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Yury A. Kozlov

Children’s Regional Clinical Hospital; Irkutsk State Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education; Irkutsk State Medical University

Email: yuriherz@hotmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2313-897X
SPIN-code: 3682-0832

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Russian Federation, Irkutsk; Irkutsk; Irkutsk

Eduard V. Sapukhin

Children’s Regional Clinical Hospital

Email: sapukhin@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5470-7384
Russian Federation, Irkutsk

Marina V. Makarochkina

Children’s Regional Clinical Hospital

Email: makarochkina@igodkb.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8295-6687
SPIN-code: 4600-4071
Russian Federation, Irkutsk

Alexey S. Strashinsky

Children’s Regional Clinical Hospital

Email: leksus-642@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1911-4468
SPIN-code: 9210-5286
Russian Federation, Irkutsk

Andrey A. Marchuk

Children’s Regional Clinical Hospital

Email: maa-ped20@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9767-0454
SPIN-code: 5668-4896
Russian Federation, Irkutsk

Alexander P. Rozhanski

Children’s Regional Clinical Hospital; Irkutsk State Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: alexanderozhanski@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7922-7600
SPIN-code: 4012-7120
Russian Federation, Irkutsk; Irkutsk

References

  1. Paul HA, Bargar WL, Mittlestadt B, et al. Development of a surgical robot for cementless total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;285:57–66. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199212000-00010
  2. Harris SJ, Arambula-Cosio F, Mei Q, et al. The Probot — an active robot for prostate resection. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 1997;211(4):317–325. doi: 10.1243/0954411971534449
  3. Rotondo MF, Schwab CW, McGonigal MD, et al. “Damage control”: an approach for improved survival in exsanguinating penetrating abdominal injury. J Trauma. 1993;35(3):375–382. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199309000-00008
  4. Satava RM. Surgical robotics: the early chronicles: a personal historical perspective. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2002;12(1):6–16. doi: 10.1097/00129689-200202000-00002
  5. Satava RM. Robotic surgery: from past to future — a personal journey. Surg Clin North Am. 2003;83(6):1491–500. doi: 10.1016/S0039-6109(03)00168-3
  6. Satava RM, Simon IB. Teleoperation, telerobotics, and telepresence in surgery. Endosc Surg Allied Technol. 1993;1(3):151–153. PMID: 8055315
  7. George EI, Brand TC, LaPorta A, et al. Origins of robotic surgery: From skepticism to standard of care. JSLS. 2018;22(4):e2018.00039. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2018.00039
  8. Bowersox JC, Shah A, Jensen J, et al. Vascular applications of telepresence surgery: initial feasibility studies in swine. J Vasc Surg. 1996;23(2):281–287. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(96)70272-0
  9. Bowersox JC, Cornum RL. Remote operative urology using a surgical telemanipulator system: preliminary observations. Urology. 1998;52(1):17–22. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00168-x
  10. Cadiere GB, Himpens J, Vertruyen M, Favretti F. The world’s first obesity surgery performed by a surgeon at a distance. Obes Surg. 1999;9(2):206–209. doi: 10.1381/096089299765553539
  11. Himpens J. Surgery in space: the future of robotic telesurgery (Haidegger T, Szandor J, Benyo Z. Surg Endosc 2011; 25(3):681-690). Surg Endosc. 2012;26(1):286. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1848-1
  12. DiMaio S, Hanuschik M, Kreaden U. The da Vinci surgical system. In: Rosen J, Hannaford B, Satava R, editors. Surgical Robotics. New York: Springer; 2011. P. 199–217. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-1126-1_9
  13. Lane T. A short history of robotic surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018;100(6S):5–7. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.supp1.5
  14. Cadière G-B, Himpens J, Germay O, et al. Feasibility of robotic laparoscopic surgery: 146 cases. World J Surg. 2001;25(11):1467–1477. doi: 10.1007/s00268-001-0132-2
  15. Tewari A, Srivasatava A, Menon M; Members of the VIP Team. A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution. BJU Int. 2003;92(3):205–210. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2003.04311.x
  16. Marescaux J, Leroy J, Rubino F, et al. Transcontinental robot-assisted remote telesurgery: feasibility and potential applications. Ann Surg. 2002;235(4):487–492. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200204000-00005

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2025 Eco-Vector

License URL: https://eco-vector.com/for_authors.php#07

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: ПИ № ФС 77 - 81892 от 24.09.2021 г.